Occupational Wages Survey 2010
Philippines, 2010 - 2011
Reference ID
PHL-BLES-OWS-2010-v1
Producer(s)
Bureau of Labor and Employment Statistics
Collection(s)
Metadata
Created on
Sep 14, 2021
Last modified
Feb 09, 2023
Page views
139400
Downloads
1097
- Data files
- ows_partab
- ows_partc
Questions and instructions
Categories
Value | Category |
---|---|
(MAKE IT BRIEF, NEEDS LONG ASSESSMENT | |
. | |
. Some questions are not applicable to us, | |
2006 non coherent | |
CAN BE MERGED INTO ONE | |
COMPLICATED MUST SHORTEN | |
HARD TO UNDERSTAND | |
I belive thr your effor will be much appreciated. . Send the survey the will not become selected that all educational instituttion wil participate in the survey. | |
It would help if the breakdown of levels are indicated . Rank and file? Supervisor? Managerial? | |
KINDLY ALSO CONSIDER CONDUCTING THE SURVEY IN SHORT PORTIONS & MAKE IT LESS TIME CONSUMING | |
LAYOUT THAT CAN BE EASILY UNDERSTAND | |
MAKE IT SMALLER | |
MAKE SIMPLE FORMS ONLY TIME CONSUMING | |
MORE SPACE FOR PART C | |
OK | |
ON LINE ANSWERING OF QUESTIONNAIRE WOULD BE MUCH EASIER | |
PLEASE AMEND THE LAYOUT TO MAKE IT MORE USER FRIENDLY | |
SAME PORTIONS TO ANSWER ARE REDUNDANT | |
SIMPLIFY LAYOUT OF PRESENTATION | |
SIMPLIFY TEMPLATE | |
TEDIOUS TO ACCOMPLISH | |
TOO COMPLICATED | |
TOO LONG, TOO MANY DATA | |
USE CAN BE EASIER OF FILLED UP VIA ON LINE INTERNET | |
VERY GOOD | |
We need explanation upon answering the survey | |
an excel file format would be easier to accomplishes | |
answering respondent sholuld be given a more shortened list of positions clearly indicated in the questionnaires | |
arrows and flow of questionnaire are confusing at times | |
attractive lay out | |
be more definite and specific | |
better if have a site on-line where we coould fill-up the data without having to write/type it down on this form. Thid way data is gathered faster and less paper is comnsumed | |
but the number of spaces for part c must be increased for at least 5 spaces | |
confusing to look at too in the beginning | |
detailed and complete (comments) | |
do not include definitions in the survey form. Use separate sheets of the paper/booklet,type | |
give more space | |
give more space for every category on part c | |
heavy text, layout confuses the respondent/person answering the qustions-make it simple | |
if we look at the questionnaire a lot of box provided making itmcomplicated | |
imthinkmneed to add more onnthe part C because theres stillmposition which Imhaven't include in there | |
it needs revision | |
it's okay | |
it's so confusing other terms are not clearly define | |
its time -consuming because it has to be specific | |
lay out should not be tidious | |
maintain as user friendly and appealing to the eye. | |
make it more simple | |
make it simple | |
make it user, respondent friedly innphil labor context. | |
make the lay out more simple | |
make the lay-out simple and user friendly | |
more precise and detailed | |
needs to have a clear and direct sample | |
no orietation | |
not enough space for greater population | |
not enough/space | |
not sure what part to answer some section are the same | |
please simplify more | |
provide begger space for the data | |
provide bigger space for the data | |
provide more space specially to questionnaire part c | |
questionnaire appears too cluttered thus difficult to follow at the start | |
refer to comment (a) above. First time to participate/fill-up theis form. | |
refernce period not explicitly stated | |
should provide examples | |
simplier questioonnairs will, help us to answer theis questionnaires faster. | |
simplify | |
simplify the format | |
so much details time needed, we have heavy workload, this iterfere with our daily rush. Its time consuming. | |
space not enough, not friendly to your eyes | |
the example are even more confusing. Examples should be sumpler | |
there are some vague questions-needs improvement | |
there is too much text which makes it confusing | |
to wordy. Please keep it safe and simply deal to what id really important | |
too crowded | |
too many details | |
too many that creates confusion | |
too much columns |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Description
Text
Suggestions given by the respondent for the improvement of layout of the questionnaire