Occupational Wages Survey 2010
Philippines, 2010 - 2011
Reference ID
PHL-BLES-OWS-2010-v1
Producer(s)
Bureau of Labor and Employment Statistics
Collection(s)
Metadata
Created on
Sep 14, 2021
Last modified
Feb 09, 2023
Page views
139701
Downloads
1097
- Data files
- ows_partab
- ows_partc
Questions and instructions
Categories
Value | Category |
---|---|
CONFUSING/EASY WORDS NEEDED | |
CONFUSING; SHOULD BE CLEARLY EXPLAINED BY CATEGORIES | |
GENERALLY EASY TO UNDERSTAND BUT PART OF THE SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE IS A LITTLE BUT CONFUSING | |
IT IS NOT EASY TO UNDERSTAND. MAKE IT SIMPLE | |
MAKE IT MORE CLEARLY, IT IS VERY TECHNICAL WHEN READING THE SURVEY | |
MAKE IT SIMPLE | |
NO COMMISSION BASIS OPTIONS | |
OCCUPATIONAL WAGES SURVEY | |
PLEASE CONSIDER CONDUCTING THE SURVEY IN EXCEL FORMAT/SOFT COPY & USE UP LESS PAPER AND ITS EASIER TO FILL OUT AND EDIT | |
REVERSE IT TO EASY AND SIMPLE | |
SIMPLIFY THE FORM/QUESTIONS | |
THERE ARE OVERLAPPING DEFINITIONS. PLEASE CLARIFY TERMS BETTER | |
TOO BROAD | |
TOO MANY TO ANSWER | |
Upon giving this form or survey explain first to the person in-charge | |
WELL DEFINED TERMS | |
WITH HELP OF ENUMERATOR | |
additional space | |
advance info should be given to the selected establishment to take part of the surveymso that data will be ready once thr form is provided | |
an explanation of filling the survey will be gratly appreciated | |
are representative from your office to help us guide so tomake the survey easy | |
auditors and accountants have different responsibilities | |
be more specific est. onnthe questions having an asnwered byninduivuidual ior genral | |
be more specific for educational institution. | |
be specific | |
be specific on the data you wantedinnordermto avoid confuaion | |
but for the revised/new items the questionnaire ae vague. | |
but time consuming | |
can we have a copy or list of occupations | |
complicated to understand/easy to understand | |
concise, no repeated words | |
confusion on part time and full time | |
definition not clear | |
e a seaparte format applicable for M81-priovatem education services/private education instituttion | |
easy to understand but some are vague because of the layout… makes the survey confusing | |
especially on part c the hardest part ever answer not specified properly what ism needed, espcially our company gotm lots of positions. | |
for first time like me a representative from dole who will explain personally how to fillm up the questionnaire will be of great help | |
further eleboration | |
give generic examples/ definition | |
guides/queation that are not applicable to educational estblishments may be omitted tosave paper lost | |
hard to follow; timemconsuming | |
have it better undestood bymthe reader and sholuld be generally qccepted terms | |
if possible the survey form sholil be on-line | |
if you use much simpler wrods in some terms in your next survey | |
instruction sholuld b clear | |
is there a way toreduce thebulk | |
it will be easier to fill in the form if this is in electronic format | |
kindly indicate the job level of the time workers | |
kindly provide tagalog tr5ansaction | |
make it less wordy and more converstional | |
make it more easy to understand even by laymen | |
make it more specific | |
make it simpler | |
make questionaire a lot better and easy, steps, complicated | |
make the suvey on-line | |
make this dform more simpler and detailed | |
moresimpler | |
no orientation | |
not easily to understand need some coaching | |
not understand | |
online questionaire/downloadable or editable form is more onveniet for the respondent | |
part a general information-queation #2 confusing if no. of hires or total employees | |
please make a simple form. This is complicated. I cannot spend so much time trying to seggregate positions. | |
please make this survey more simple | |
questions are redendant-try to be specific on the information and ask it only once | |
redundant questions | |
should be made easier | |
simplify | |
simplify part c in simple matrix | |
simplify the form | |
simplifyr more | |
simplifyr the questionnare | |
some questions are not related to ur establishement as a security agency | |
some terms are not applicable to our business/org structure | |
take's time to prepare data for the qquestionnaire | |
the presentaion of the questionnare is complicated so I suggest that you make it simplified | |
the second time yes | |
there are so many data needed that we have to go back all over again on our files for 2007 and with june & july 2008 | |
though limited selection on hotel/restaurant list of occupatuion | |
to provide written explanation/instruction on how to answer this form | |
to wordy t the extent that the person reading could not easily get. Pleasr be precise | |
too tidious and long | |
tooanay questions | |
undersandable | |
understandable but not that easy | |
use questionnaire specoficasllymdesigned with our own business/induatry | |
veryntidious. Should allow respondent more time since data are very detailed. | |
well taken and easy to understand | |
yes , but presentationmsholuld be more precise |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Description
Text
Suggestions given by the respondent regarding the defition of terms used in the survey