Occupational Wages Survey 2010
Philippines, 2010 - 2011
Reference ID
PHL-BLES-OWS-2010-v1
Producer(s)
Bureau of Labor and Employment Statistics
Collection(s)
Metadata
Created on
Sep 14, 2021
Last modified
Feb 09, 2023
Page views
139440
Downloads
1097
- Data files
- ows_partab
- ows_partc
Questions and instructions
Categories
Value | Category |
---|---|
. | |
ACCOMPLISHED & SUBMITTED BEFORE THE SAID DEADLINE | |
ADEQUATE ENOUGH | |
CAN BE USED AS BASIS FOR COMPENSATION STUDIES | |
CANNOT FIND OUR INDUSTRY GROUP IN THE LISTING | |
FAIR & GOOD | |
GOOD | |
GOOD PRESENTATION | |
I noticed that heigher salaries are given on electricity, gas and water supply industries | |
INFORMATIVE/ FACTUAL | |
IT GIVBES ME MORE KNOWLEDGE ON THE STATISTICS OF THE DIFFERENT OCCUPATION BUT IF EVER YOU CAN ADD MORE OCCUPATION DEFINITELY OK | |
IT WOULD BE BEST THAT SINCE THIS SURVEY IS FOR 2008, RESULTS OF 2007 SHOULD ATTACHED (INSTEAD OF 2006 | |
NO COMMENT | |
REALISTIC AND APPLICABLE | |
RESULTS OF SURVEY WERE NOT FORWARDED TO US AS PARTICIPANT | |
THE RESULT IS APPEALING AND INFORMATIVE | |
VERY CLEAR & EASY TO UNDERSTAND | |
VERY INFORMATIVE AND CLEARLY PRESENTED | |
WE DID NOT FILED OUT 2006 OWS | |
WE DID NOT RECEIVED ANY | |
WE DIDN’T RECEIVE SURVEY FORM FOR 2006 | |
anz seems to provided basic pay higher than industry median. | |
appealling when it comes to presentation but it is quite hard to understant | |
base on current basic pay plus cole | |
clear, useful | |
easyn to understand and provided me a benchmark for hiring entry | |
for prvate school-please consider thennumber of days | |
good | |
informative | |
infrmative | |
it could b better for the industry/company that result of thensurvey includes statistics salary for workers/rank andnfile and engineers (separte statistics) | |
it helps in dtermining labor cost and importance of employment | |
it sgood to know that we are being one of the source of statistics to determine progress of our nations labor employment. | |
its not presented well | |
make data are user friendy | |
more ieasier to understand | |
no comment | |
no comments | |
no idea, not ablem,to get a copy | |
not recepient of 2006 ows so we have no idea | |
oi | |
ok | |
professional and skilled workers received higher salaries than the skilled workers | |
provide a general idea /overview on our labor market | |
rates are almost the same with the rates are provided to our employment | |
salient featres of the 2006 ows presented through bar graphs - impressive | |
simple but chalenging | |
since we started comleting theis survey we have not received any result | |
some of the employers are not well iformed with regards to their rights as employees as well onr with regards totheir salaries, and wagesand wages. | |
the result of the 2006 ows show the disparity of monthly basic pay of time-rated workers on full-time basis. A great help for us to determine our basic pay | |
the school was not given feedback on the result of thid survey. | |
they maybe used as refernce in job evaluation | |
useful benchmark | |
user friendly | |
very good | |
very good tool in evaluating our standing with regards to our wages | |
very informative | |
very informative and can be a basis for future planning | |
very informative as reference | |
very satisfactory | |
we did not receive 2006 ows results | |
we have not received the data results | |
well presented. A ready reference or information on regional wage status |
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
Description
Text
Comments/Remarks of the respondent regarding the results of the 2006 OWS